Rebuttal from Philip Andrew

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Editorial and Rebuttal from Authors

As more and more men undergo radical prostatectomy as their primary treatment for prostate cancer, it is becoming evident that not all of them will enjoy a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-free status for the rest of their life. As presented in other series with long-term follow-up, the risk for biochemical recurrence continued to increase over time in a large European series from Hamburg [1]. T...

متن کامل

Mortality from Hurricane Andrew.

Hurricane Andrew, a category 4 storm, made landfall in South Florida on August 24, 1992, and caused extensive structural and environmental damage. The Dade County Medical Examiner Department investigated 15 deaths directly related to the storm and another 15 natural deaths indirectly related to the storm. The aftermath of the hurricane continued to create circumstances that lead to 32 accidenta...

متن کامل

Rebuttal from Millet, Faiss, and Pialoux.

Read more and get great! That's what the book enPDFd rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux will give for every reader to read this book. This is an on-line book provided in this website. Even this book becomes a choice of someone to read, many in the world also loves it so much. As what we talk, when you read more every page of this rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux, what you will obtain ...

متن کامل

Rebuttal from Daniel Beard and Eric Feigl.

Dr. Andrew’s proposal (Andrew, 2013) to rename Guyton’s venous return curve the ‘venous pressure curve’ seems unlikely to overcome the decades of misinterpretation and confusion that the Guytonmodel of the systemic circulation has engendered. In Guyton’s experiments venous return curves were produced with a pump connected from the right atrium to the pulmonary artery in an anaesthetized, open c...

متن کامل

Rebuttal from David Simpson and Jurgen Claassen

We have read the point of view presented elegantly by Tzeng and Panerai (2018) with interest. We have to admit there is little hard evidence on which we can base our preference for enhanced blood pressure variability. The arguments against, however, are also not very strong. The argument is perhaps more strongly based on basic principles than solid evidence. We fully agree with Tzeng and Panera...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Physiology

سال: 2013

ISSN: 0022-3751

DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.264648